Ego-Piercing Analogy: Guiliani and Combat Experience

⊆ May 30th, 2007 by MoonBat | ˜ No Comments »

On the May 16th edition of MSNBC’s Countdown with Keith Olbermann, CNBC chief Washington correspondent and Wall Street Journal national political editor John Harwood commented about Rudy Guiliani that

Rudy Giuliani also has a bit of a claim to combat in a different way [than John McCain], because he was on the ground in 9-11.

Rudy Guiliani claiming “combat experience” for being on the ground on 9/11 is akin to a camera-man tackled on the sidelines claiming he played in the NFL.

The only combat experience Rudy Guiliani has had has been jeu slots casinobonus reward casino770casino jeux parisplay keno onlinecasino 10 eurojack russel black andabsoluflash com jeu casino barcasino gratuites sur internetjeux casino gratuites comjeux casino sans depotjeux de casino gratuitsenquete casino on netla roulette rustrejeux casino en ligne,meilleur casino en ligne,casino en lignewww jeux casino comonline casino gamesjack blackwww supermarché casinosjeu de roulette,jeu de roulette russe,règles du jeu de roulettejeux de casino gratuitementjeu baccarat en ligne gratuitesslots onlineenquete eurobarre casino on netbonus casinos en ligneannuaire casino en ligneblackjack pay paypalwww casino vacances frwww casino vacancestelecharger jeu casinojack black benastuce pour gagner au casinosupermarché casinojeux de casino gratuits en ligne,jeux de casino en ligne,jeux de casino en ligne gratuitescasino games procasino bonus offertcasino jeux argentand black jacktop casino en ligne,casino ligne,le meilleur casino en ligneblack jack forcasinos video pokermeilleur bonus casinoblack jack gratisjeux casino gratiutcasinos on netcasino blackjackbaccarat room en lignela roulette francaisecasino en ligne surle casino gratuites sans dépotnouveau casino avec bonus in fighting with his ex-wife, but unless he’s planning to marry Osama Bin Laden, how that will help national security is a mystery.


Love and Deep Pockets

⊆ May 24th, 2007 by MoonBat | ˜ No Comments »

I, MoonBat™, Superhero, have once again uncovered another perfidious way in which the Demoncrats—the political wing of the Vast Left Wing Conspiracy (VLWC)—are undermining the very fabric of American society. It was reported that New Jersey Governor Jon S. Corzine (D-No Seatbelt), paid his ex-girlfriend $6 Million dollars upon their break-up. He set up a trust for her two children to go to college, bought her a car and provided the down-payment for a condo apartment, as well as a loan for the mortgage on a house, which he later forgave. Moreover, he has refused to comment or explain why he gave his ex this money.

This, of course, is just not how it is done in America. It is not in line with good Republican values. This is not how you treat a girlfriend, ex or otherwise. Look at Paul Wolfowitz, for example. If he were to be as morally weak as Governor Corzine, he’d have given money to his wife, from whom he is separated, but instead he focused his efforts on getting his current “companion” promotions and raises. Of course, the fact that he gave his current lover more than trace evidence on a little black dress has been totally blown out of proportion, and has cost him his job at the World Bank—leaving him only a $400,000 “longevity bonus” to console him, and the bitter taste of a well-licked comb to remind him of his fall from grace. (At least he can now afford socks.)

Paul Wolfowitz, you might think, had done something dishonest by using his influence to get his girlfriend promotions. Moreover, he enriched her—unlike Governor Corzine did with his ex—with tax-payer dollars. That we are being asked to subsidize his dating life could be taken as an outrage, and many Demoncrats will decry it; but this is precisely what they’ve been doing for years. Think about all the welfare payments that have gone out to poor women who live, without benefit of Holy Matrimony, with men! Demoncrats want us subsidizing whole swaths of people! One could even assume that Paul Wolfowitz is a Demoncrat based on his conduct in this matter; but we know he isn’t because he had a mistress while still married. (Which would make him seem very Clintonian, but it’s not the same since he’s not in the White House. Instead, he’s very Gingrichian.)

Now you might wonder why I didn’t say he was very Guilianian, having a mistress while being married. Well, that’s because Rudy is really a Demoncrat. While it might seem that he was a Republican, since he had a mistress while still being married, Gracie Mansion is not the White House and his soon-to-be third wife was on his payroll at $125,000 a year as an assistant. That means the money he paid her as a salaried employee is a tax deduction, which means the American Public was paying for his mistress. Moreover, because she is an employee, all of her expenses would be tax-deductable as well. So Rudy, while subsidizing his dating with tax-payer dollars, was still shelling out himself which is what Demoncrats do.

Unfortunately for Mr. Wolfowitz, he and his mistress have parted ways. Fortunately for him, there is comfort in the proper Republican model of conduct between exes. Ann Coulter’s ex-lover, an FBI agent, interceded on her behalf in a Palm Beach Sheriff’s investigation into felony voter fraud. Ann registered to vote using her real estate agent’s address to avoid a stalker. Had she been a Demoncrat, she would have purchased her home through a trust or LLC, concealing her address in that manner. But being forthright and Republican, she didn’t think of that, and resorted to the expedient of this voter registration deception. Her ex-lover got this blatantly frivolous charge dismissed, fulfilling the dictate that good Republican lovers cover each other in case of criminal prosecution.

Which is not to suggest that Scooter Libby and Dick Cheney were lovers and this motivated Scooter’s willingness to take one for the team. We know this isn’t not false, because Vice President Dick Cheney’s phone number “isn’t not” on the DC Madam’s list of numbers. See, it wouldn’t not be okay for Dick Cheney to have a mistress, since he isn’t not out the White House.

Nor is this to suggest that Alberto Gonzales and Our President have done the “full-Gannon” in the White House, despite the AG’s apparent willingness to take a bullet for Karl Rove and Our President. There is a difference between sucking-up and sucking-off, after all. And there is no evidence that Karl and Alberto were lovers, since there is no evidence that Karl got Alberto any promotions or raises—the Wolfowitzian model. And while the lack of evidence isn’t evidence of lack, the fact that breasts reappeared in the Department of Justice after General Gonzales took office suggests he likes girls.

And the fact the Monica Goodling was willing to take on for Alberto Gonzales doesn’t mean she took one from Alberto Gonzales.

There is that all clear? To boil it down: Demoncrats bad, Republican’s good, and how you tell the difference is very simple. Demoncrats spend their own money for dating, and want us to subsidize dating for the masses. Republicans, being far more exclusive, allow us to pay their lovers for the honor of comforting those who do so much, so selflessly, for us.


Too Stupid to be a Republican

⊆ May 13th, 2007 by MoonBat | ˜ No Comments »

I, MoonBatâ„¢, superhero, have been quite busy dealing with the Federal Life-sucking Tax (which was due on the 17th of April this year) and then having to work. I mean, this superheroing stuff is expensive. Now let me say that on this Mother’s Day, I have no desire to have seen my parents gunned down in cold blood on the mean streets of a major, American metropolitan center—even if it would have left me with enough money to be worrying about the Death Taxâ„¢. But would it have killed mom to have gotten on a ladder that tipped over, or to have gotten some Mickey D’s coffee spilled on her? While I agree that we need a lot of tort reform in this country, we could reform it after I get an operating budget.

And, yes, I know there are easier ways to get money, but I’m not dating Paul Wolfowitz for even all the money Bill Gates has.

But things have slowed down at the Suds ‘n’ Duds now that the students are all going off on summer vacation, which means I don’t have to be cleaning DNA evidence out of lint traps. This has given me time to catch up on the news, and three glaring things have stood out. Well, three men, but united by one thing: all three are pretending to be Republicans in their bid for the Presidency.

I’ll start with Senator Sam Brownback of Kansas. Friday, May 11th, the Senator is in Wisconsin to drum up support for his campaign. Like many politicians, he sought to explain a complex problem and instead of opting for the True Conservativeâ„¢ analogy—a Bible story that’s on point—he went with the next best thing: a sports analogy. It’s a wise choice. It show’s he’s a man of the people. He’s the kind of guy who would sit with you in the stands, drink a beer, paint his belly green-and-gold, shave the number 4 into his head and cheer himself hoarse. He’s in Wisconsin, home of the Packers.

So the Senator concludes his football analogy by saying,

If you don’t have a line, how many passes can Peyton Manning complete? Greatest quarterback, maybe, in NFL history.

Okay, that remark, in Wisconsin, home of Brett Farve, who is the greatest quarterback ever to have played the game, was incredibly stupid. But then he went on to say:

I’m not sure how I recover from this.

Let me see. First, you’re the Senator from Kansas—the state were a town got leveled by tornadoes flatter than if Godzilla and his friends had held a dance-a-thon there. What in the name of the Lord are you even doing in Wisconsin? How do you recover from this? You get your silly, faux-Conservative bottom back to Kansas and you start gathering up kindling. Then you use that kindling to light a fire under the butts of your pals in the Senate and the White House to make sure Kansas isn’t The Gulf Coast North!

As bad as that was, Wisconsin’s former Governor, Tommy Thompson is even worse. You’ll recall that he made a major gaffe recently. Liberals would have you think I mean his remark about “hard work” being “part of the Jewish tradition.” Nope, not that. Or they’ll have you think I mean when, in the Republican debate, he said that he thought it should be okay for employers who find homosexuality immoral to fire employees for that reason. Nope, not that either. Then, you ask, which gaffe is it to which I refer?

It’s his descent into the blame game. Immediately after the debate he retracted his comment, citing a failing battery in a hearing aid that rendered him unable to clearly hear the question. More recently he’s added that he’d been sick earlier in the week, including a trip to the ER, so he was suffering from a cold and the flu during the debate, and “I could not wait until the debate got off so I could go to the bathroom.”

So what Tommy is saying here—if you listen with a Liberal ear—is “I’m a feeble, deaf old man who can’t kick a flu and needs to be wearing Dependsâ„¢. On top of that, you should make me President because even if I don’t hear what you’re asking, I’ll still give you an answer which, after I think on it, I’ll realize is offensive and I’ll apologize. Moreover, I have neither the intelligence to realize when my hearing aids are on the fritz, nor the wherewithall to hire staffers smart enough to do a pitstop and sound-check before I step into a battle for my political life.”

I mean, if that doesn’t scream, “I’m a Demoncrat,” I don’t know what does.

But worst of all is America’s Mayorâ„¢, which I can say, as opposed to Rudy Guilianiâ„¢, which I guess he’s trademarked so you can’t say bad things about him. And Rudy has kind of made sure that anything you say about him could be construed as bad, since he’s pretty much come down on all sides of any issue, so even statements supporting him could be seen as bad in some circles. About the only circle where disparaging remarks would be seen as good would be the circle of his ex-wives and children—which constitutes a surprisingly large constituency these days.

Now Rudy has made some mistakes in his career. I, MoonBatâ„¢ (two can play that game, Mr. Rudyâ„¢), superhero; do find it curious that he’s running on his great expertise as an anti-terrorism expert. Face it, he was mayor at the time of the first World Trade Center bombing. What’s his answer to terrorism? To put his anti-terrorism headquarters in the World Trade Center. Seems that’s like slapping a “Kick me,” sign on your own back, then wondering why someone stuffs size 12 Brogans up your butt.

But Rudy and his staff really outdid themselves in Iowa. Back in the tail end of April—according to the Anamosa Journal-Eureka—Rudy’s staffers called Deb and Jerry VonSprecken of Olin, Iowa and asked them to host a campaign rally on May 4th. The couple, who own and run a modest 80 acre farm, felt honored and agreed. They began planning and inviting people for the shindig. School was going to let out early; the Sheriff’s Department and the Fire Department were all lined up to help.

Having America’s Mayorâ„¢ visit was going to be a big deal.

Then, on May 1st, the campaign called and wanted to know about the family’s assets. They wanted to know their net worth. The VonSpreckens complied and a short while later, Tony Delgado, from the Des Moines office, called and told them “I’m sorry, you aren’t worth a million dollars and he is campaigning on the Death Tax right now.” Delgado canceled the visit and the VonSpreckens were crushed—pretty much now experiencing the “Donna Hanover Syndrome,” as it’s called.

But wait, there’s more. In move that smacks of the Demoncratic tendancy to use circular firing-squads, yet later that day the campaign calls Deb VonSprecken and asked her to introduce Rudy at an event in Cedar Rapids! And a Guiliani campaign spokesperson, Maria Comella, issued the following statement:

“We’re glad to have Debby and Jerry’s support and are thankful for all their hard work on the campaign. We’re looking forward to our visit to Iowa on Friday and having the opportunity to share Mayor giuliani’s message of fiscal discipline.”

Fiscal Discipline? Rudy’s doing exactly what tax-and-spend Liberals do: make others pay for things you don’t need. In this case it’s some nice folks who run a family farm, the backbone of this nation. If not for the VonSpreckens of the world, we’d not have the gallon of milk that Rudy doesn’t know the price of.

But this, of course, is not the most grossly stupid thing he did. Rudy didn’t address the problem, so what happens? John McCain, ever the opportunist calls up Deb VonSprecken and apologizes on the behalf of all politicians for America’s Mayorâ„¢. Giving a True Republican—or whatever it is that John McCain is—a chance to steal a march for your mistake is all but patented by the Demoncrat party!

Aside from putting the Rude in Rudy, Rudy is pointing out that his Presidential style is going to be one of arrogantly rolling over the folks he needs, letting others sheer him off his base, then standing amid the rubble of the whole mess and declaring that he’ll fix it. He might as well change his name to Franklin Delano Guilianiâ„¢ and be done with the whole charade.

Of course, we know what this means: somewhere, probably in a secret laboratory in New Hampshire, some evil genius—funded by George Soros, no doubt—has Thompson, Brownback, Guiliani and others on ice, and has put up these pod-people in their places. It’s a plot, no doubt about it. These people can’t be for real.


Hollywood-Al Qaeda Connection Proved!

⊆ April 2nd, 2007 by MoonBat | ˜ No Comments »

I, MoonBatâ„¢, superhero, have long known of the connections between Hollywood and Al Qaeda, but I had not been aware of just how perfidiously and perniciously deep the connections went. I mean, the signs were there, but I had missed them. Thank goodness the folks in the FBI and Department of Homeland Security are picking up the slack.

The 1982 Disney science fiction film TRON has been declared “sensitive” by DHS officials. National Security Letters have been sent to Disney and video outlets, demanding the surrender of all copies. It turns out that the film was shot, in part, in an experimental nuclear facility, which has since been dismantled. The film, which Disney was planning to remaster for HD-DVD release, has blurry details that could compromise the security of America’s nuclear technology.

At least, that’s what DHS wants you to believe. The truth of the matter is that TRON reveals senstive details about the Internets’ tubes. In the movie Jeff Bridges’ character rides a laser-cycle thingie through the Internets. Even as we speak, Al Qaeda technology experts are hard at work fashioning laser-cycles in Waziristan which, when communicated into the Internets tubes via video-tapes broadcast worldwide, will allow Osama bin Laden to invade the Internets and wreak havoc. He will hit America where it lives, bombing Second Life sites and disrupting My Space pages.

Now, my friends, we must brace ourselves for the liberal backlash against what they will decry as a government grossly intruding on the rights of others. They’ll point out that quarantining the publicly available copies of TRON will do nothing to secure all the privately held copies both here and abroad. Such wags will point out that if TRON is a security risk, then surely Tom Clancy’s novel, Sum of All Fears, is a greater one; since it discusses in great and exquisite detail how to construct an atomic bomb. Even an obscure science fiction novel, Bred for War by Michael A. Stackpole, might be considered sensitive as it contains a plan for triggering truck bombs that is undetectible by current methods.

Liberals would contend that it is a small step from classifying films like TRON or the aforementioned novels which have techical details, to classifying works because they have dangerous ideas. Because the FBI has already admitted that they were a bit zealous in the use of National Security Letters, Demoncrats will complain that the threat of same will have a chilling effect on free discourse in the nation. But, as Our President notes, when you’re supporting Al Qaeda through your empty rhetoric, you’re pretty much committing treason anyway, so pack your bags for Gitmo, lit-boy, because there’s no room for you in this America.

And thank the heavens that the FBI was all over this plot to expose our laser-cycle-in-the-internets-tubes vulnerability to Al Qaeda. When Disney sent them the letter about their desire to remaster the film, did they sit on it as they did memos about Muslims learning to fly planes but not to land or take off? Nope. They investigated immediately. I wouldn’t doubt now that Mickey Mouse and Donald Duck are on the list for body cavity searches the next time they get on a plane. If not for the sharp eye of some letter opener at the FBI, the smoking gun would be a laser-cycle racing through your spam.

Hollywood has long been on the path to sedition. I should have seen it earlier with Disney, of course. TRON was produced during the Cold War, and the Soviets probably mined it for all the secrets they could. And Disney produced that Alladin film, and even had Alladin on Ice which was all about brainwashing our children into accepting Muslims as heroes and showing them that Genies were good, even though we know Djinn are evil and demonic. It was pure propaganda.

Hollywood really needs to return to its roots and start getting with the program. During World War II they created plenty of patriotic fare. In this day and age of digital remastering they’d not even have to do reshoots. They could take that classic film Red Dawn and substitute terrorists for the Soviets. Or, even better, they could take Gone with the Wind and use it to show us how America will suffer if we stop fighting them over there, and have to fight them here.

Best of all, with some movie magic, we have Jodie Foster and Anthony Hopkins in Silence of the Liberals. Now that’s entertainment.

Update: Revenant has pointed out to me that the above story was posted in a category called Fiction, and that the FBI agent quoted in it is named “Lirpa Sloof,” which he contends is “April Fools” backwards. He has suggested that I was gulled unmercifully and that I should be ashamed of myself.

But I am not. This clearly was a Liberal Demoncrat from Hollywood’s attempt to stir up anti-Bush feelings by suggesting the Administration would do something blatantly stupid. The whole Alberto Gonzales and attorney firings is a similar thing. All trumped up and false.

Hoax or not, it does not invalidate my premise that Disney has been pushing a pro-Al Qaeda agenda for a time since before Al Qaeda existed. And what about all those Sabu films? And the stop-animation Harryhausen films? They just romanticize Arabia and make us think of those people as benign and peace-loving–a tactic adopted by the Muslims who live among us, too. One cannot be fooled by appearances. Peaceful folks can really be harboring evil.

I mean, look at the Amish. They hate technology, just like Al Qaeda. They segregate themselves in their own little communities and don’t want to mix with outsiders, just like Al Qaeda. They have subordinate roles for women, just like Al Qaeda. They don’t speak English as a preference, just like Al Qaeda. Are we going to believe they are just peaceful folks, or do they have to clip-clop a buggy-bomb up to a highway fruit-stand and reduce it to a smoothie before we see what’s really going on?

And Hollywood still isn’t stepping up here. Sure, the TV series 24 is doing its part, but where’s everyone else? I think a lot could be done here. For example, there’s a very popular comedy in syndication right now that ought to be renamed. If we called it Everyone loves Raymond (except Liberals and their Al Qaeda allies) America would get the message.

Hollywood, you are on notice. TRON might have been a hoax, but we’re watching you.